Litter Act 1979

Offences and penalties

19A: Strict liability for certain offences

You could also call this:

"You can get in trouble for littering even if it was an accident"

If you are accused of breaking a rule in the Litter Act 1979, the police do not need to prove that you did it on purpose, except for some specific cases like those against section 16 or 17(1)(a). This means you can still get in trouble even if you did not mean to litter. The law is written this way to make it clear how it works.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM33483.


Previous

19: Offences punishable on summary conviction, or

"Breaking litter rules: punishments that are no longer used"


Next

19B: Defences to strict liability offences, or

"Excuses you can use if you're accused of littering and it wasn't your fault"

19AStrict liability for certain offences

  1. In prosecuting an offence against a provision of this Act (other than an offence against section 16 or 17(1)(a)), the prosecution does not need to prove that the defendant intentionally committed the offence.

  2. This section is for the avoidance of doubt.

Notes
  • Section 19A: inserted, on , by section 11 of the Litter Amendment Act 2006 (2006 No 24).