Inquiries Act 2013

Duties, powers, immunities, and privileges - Powers and duties of inquiry relating to procedure

14: Regulation of inquiry procedure

You could also call this:

"Running an inquiry fairly and efficiently"

Illustration for Inquiries Act 2013

When you are part of an inquiry, you can run it in a way that you think is best, unless the Inquiries Act 2013 or your terms of reference say otherwise. You must make sure you follow the principles of natural justice, which means being fair and giving people a chance to say what they think. You also need to think about how to avoid wasting time or money.

When you are making decisions about how to run the inquiry, you must consider the need to avoid delay or extra cost. If you are going to make a decision that might be bad for someone, you must make sure they know what you are thinking and have had a chance to respond.

You get to decide things like who to interview, whether to call witnesses, and whether to hold hearings. You can also decide how people give evidence or make submissions, and whether they can ask each other questions.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM1566149.


Previous

13: Counsel to assist inquiry, or

"Getting a lawyer to help with an inquiry"


Next

15: Power to impose restrictions on access to inquiry, or

"Controlling who sees information from an inquiry"

Part 3Duties, powers, immunities, and privileges
Powers and duties of inquiry relating to procedure

14Regulation of inquiry procedure

  1. An inquiry may conduct its inquiry as it considers appropriate, unless otherwise specified—

  2. by this Act; or
    1. in the terms of reference of the inquiry.
      1. In making a decision as to the procedure or conduct of an inquiry, or in making a finding that is adverse to any person, an inquiry must—

      2. comply with the principles of natural justice; and
        1. have regard to the need to avoid unnecessary delay or cost in relation to public funds, witnesses, or other persons participating in the inquiry.
          1. If an inquiry proposes to make a finding that is adverse to any person, the inquiry must, using whatever procedure it may determine, be satisfied that the person—

          2. is aware of the matters on which the proposed finding is based; and
            1. has had an opportunity, at any time during the course of the inquiry, to respond on those matters.
              1. Without limiting subsections (1) to (3), an inquiry may determine matters such as—

              2. whether to conduct interviews, and if so, who to interview:
                1. whether to call witnesses, and if so, who to call:
                  1. whether to hold hearings in the course of its inquiry, and if so, when and where hearings are to be held:
                    1. whether to receive evidence or submissions from or on behalf of any person participating in the inquiry:
                      1. whether to receive oral or written evidence or submissions and the manner and form of the evidence or submissions:
                        1. whether to allow or restrict cross-examination of witnesses.