Defamation Act 1992

Defences - General

23: Evidence of adequacy of redress

You could also call this:

"Proof that someone is trying to fix a problem fairly"

Illustration for Defamation Act 1992

You are in a court case about defamation. If someone writes a letter or statement to explain or contradict something, it can be used as evidence that they are being reasonable. This is if they offer to let a Judge decide if the letter or statement is okay. You can find more information about this in section 18(2)(a) and section 25. If someone refuses to let a Judge decide, it can be used as evidence that they are being unreasonable.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM281236.

This page was last updated on View changes


Previous

22: Consent to publication, or

"Defending yourself if someone agreed to let you share information"


Next

24: Declarations, or

"Asking the court to say someone is guilty of defamation"

Part 2Defences
General

23Evidence of adequacy of redress

  1. In proceedings for defamation, it is evidence of the reasonableness of a letter or statement by way of explanation or contradiction under section 18(2)(a), or of a retraction or statement of explanation or rebuttal, or of both explanation and rebuttal, under section 25, that the party by whom it was proposed has offered to have any issues as to its content or presentation determined, in chambers, by a Judge.

  2. In proceedings for defamation, it is evidence of the unreasonableness of any such statement, letter, or retraction that the party by whom it was proposed has refused an offer by any other party to have any issues as to its content or presentation determined, in chambers, by a Judge.

  3. Any issue as to the content or presentation of a letter or statement by way of explanation or contradiction under section 18(2)(a), or of a retraction or statement of explanation or rebuttal, or of both explanation and rebuttal, under section 25, may, on the application of any person, be determined, in chambers, by a Judge.