Defamation Act 1992

Procedure

51: Evidence as to publisher or printer

You could also call this:

"Proof of who wrote or printed something"

Illustration for Defamation Act 1992

When you are in court for saying something bad about someone in a book or newspaper, you might see a statement that says who published or printed it. This statement can be used as evidence that the person named really did publish or print it, unless someone proves that it is not true. You can use this statement as proof, but someone can still argue that it is wrong.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM281271.

This page was last updated on View changes


Previous

50: Striking out for want of prosecution, or

"The court can stop your case if you don't do anything with it for a year."


Next

52: General verdict by jury, or

"The jury makes a final decision in a defamation case"

Part 4Procedure

51Evidence as to publisher or printer

  1. Where, in any proceedings for defamation in respect of the publication of any matter in a book or printed document, or in a number or part of a newspaper or other periodical, that book, document, number, or part contains or bears a statement that it is published or printed by the defendant, that statement may be received as sufficient evidence of the fact so stated unless the contrary is proved.

Compare
  • 1954 No 46 s 21