Defamation Act 1992

Causes of action

5: Malicious falsehood actionable without proof of special damage

You could also call this:

"Saying false things to hurt someone's business can get you in trouble"

Illustration for Defamation Act 1992

If you say something false about someone's goods or title to harm them, you can be taken to court. You don't need to prove you lost money if what was said is likely to cause you financial loss. This is because the court thinks the false statement will probably cost you money.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM281212.

This page was last updated on View changes


Previous

4: Defamation actionable without proof of special damage, or

"You can sue for defamation without proving you were specially harmed."


Next

6: Proceedings for defamation brought by body corporate, or

"Companies can sue for defamation if they lose money because of false statements"

Part 1Causes of action

5Malicious falsehood actionable without proof of special damage

  1. In proceedings for slander of title, slander of goods, or other malicious falsehood, it is not necessary to allege or prove special damage if the publication of the matter that is the subject of the proceedings is likely to cause pecuniary loss to the plaintiff.

Compare
  • 1954 No 46 s 5(1)