Bail Act 2000

Court bail - Granting of bail on adjournment - Electronic monitoring condition

30C: Court must not grant bail with EM condition if less restrictive bail conditions suffice

You could also call this:

"Courts can't use electronic monitoring for bail if simpler rules would work."

Illustration for Bail Act 2000

If you are given bail with an electronic monitoring condition, the court must think about whether a less restrictive condition would be enough. The court must consider if a less restrictive condition can ensure the outcomes set out in section 30A(a) to (c). You will not be given bail with an electronic monitoring condition if a less restrictive condition is sufficient.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM5598983.


Previous

30B: When court may grant bail with EM condition, or

"When You Can Get Bail with an Electronic Monitor"


Next

30D: Application for bail with EM condition, or

"Applying for bail with an electronic monitor"

Part 3Court bail
Granting of bail on adjournment: Electronic monitoring condition

30CCourt must not grant bail with EM condition if less restrictive bail conditions suffice

  1. A court must not grant bail with an EM condition if the court considers that a less restrictive condition or combination of conditions would be sufficient to ensure the outcomes set out in section 30A(a) to (c).

Notes
  • Section 30C: inserted, on , by section 19 of the Bail Amendment Act 2013 (2013 No 66).