Criminal Investigations (Bodily Samples) Act 1995

Miscellaneous provisions - Procedural and evidential provisions

68: Standard of proof

You could also call this:

"How a judge decides what is most likely true"

Illustration for Criminal Investigations (Bodily Samples) Act 1995

When a judge is making a decision about a fact in a case under the Criminal Investigations (Bodily Samples) Act 1995, they decide based on what is most likely to be true. The judge looks at the evidence and makes a decision on the balance of probabilities, which means they choose the option that seems more probable. You can think of the balance of probabilities like a scale, where the judge weighs up the evidence and decides which side is heavier.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM369824.

This page was last updated on View changes


Previous

67: Application of Legal Services Act 2000, or

"How the Legal Services Act 2000 applies to the Criminal Investigations Act"


Next

69: Non-attendance of persons not to affect admissibility of evidence, or

"Evidence is still allowed in court even if your support person isn't there."

Part 5Miscellaneous provisions
Procedural and evidential provisions

68Standard of proof

  1. Any question of fact to be determined by a High Court Judge or a District Court Judge or a Youth Court Judge on an application made under this Act shall be determined on the balance of probabilities.