Court Martial Act 2007

Jurisdiction, procedures, and powers - Jurisdiction and sittings of Court Martial - Sittings of Court Martial

42: Special provisions in cases involving sexual violation

You could also call this:

"Rules to protect people in court cases about sexual violation"

Illustration for Court Martial Act 2007

When you are in a Court Martial and someone is talking about a sexual violation, only certain people can be in the room. You can be there if you are the Judge, a military member, or the person who is accused of doing something wrong. The accused person's lawyer and some other special people can also be there. Before the person who was affected by the sexual violation starts talking, the Judge must make sure only the right people are in the room. The Judge must also tell the person who was affected that they can ask for someone they trust to be with them. The Judge can decide to stop people from talking about what happened to the person who was affected, if that is what is best for them. The Judge already has the power to make rules about who can be in the room and what can be talked about, and this section does not change that, as stated in section 39(2). This means the Judge can still make decisions about what is best for the person who was affected and for the Court Martial. The Judge's main goal is to make sure the Court Martial is fair and safe for everyone involved.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM1001983.

This page was last updated on View changes


Previous

41: Application of section 42, or

"When section 42 applies to sexual violation court cases"


Next

43: Preliminary procedure, or

"What happens before a Court Martial trial starts"

Part 2Jurisdiction, procedures, and powers
Jurisdiction and sittings of Court Martial: Sittings of Court Martial

42Special provisions in cases involving sexual violation

  1. While the complainant in a case involving sexual violation is giving oral evidence (whether in chief or under cross-examination or on re-examination), no person may be present except the following:

  2. the Judge for the proceeding:
    1. a military member:
      1. an officer under instruction:
        1. the Director of Military Prosecutions or any person acting on behalf of the Director:
          1. the accused and any escort of the accused:
            1. the accused's counsel or defender:
              1. the Registrar or any other officer of the Court Martial:
                1. an interpreter required in the proceedings:
                  1. an accredited news media reporter:
                    1. a person whose presence is requested by the complainant:
                      1. a person expressly permitted by the Judge to be present.
                        1. Before the complainant in a case involving sexual violation commences to give evidence, the Judge must—

                        2. ensure that no person other than one referred to in subsection (1) is present; and
                          1. advise the complainant of the complainant's right to request the presence of any person under subsection (1)(j).
                            1. If, in a case involving sexual violation, the Judge is of the opinion that the interests of the complainant so require, he or she may make an order forbidding publication of any report or account giving details of the criminal acts alleged to have been performed on the complainant or of any acts that the complainant is alleged to have been compelled or induced to perform or consent to or acquiesce in.

                            2. This section does not limit or affect the powers of the Judge to make an order specified in section 39(2) that excludes any person from, or forbids the publication of any report or account of, the proceedings.