Plain language law

New Zealand law explained for everyone

Financial Service Providers (Registration and Dispute Resolution) Act 2008

Dispute resolution - Reserve scheme - Appointment of reserve scheme

75: Objection to intended recommendation for revocation

You could also call this:

"You used to be able to disagree if someone wanted to remove a financial service provider from a list, but this rule no longer exists."

This part of the law used to be about how you could object if someone wanted to recommend revoking something related to financial service providers. However, this section doesn't exist anymore. It was removed on 1 July 2014. The government made this change when they updated the rules about registering and solving disputes for financial service providers.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM1109592.

Topics:
Money and consumer rights > Banking and loansMoney and consumer rights > Consumer protectionBusiness > Industry rules
Previous

74: Notice of intention to recommend revocation of appointment as reserve scheme under section 73(2)(a) or (b), or

"Telling a backup problem-solver they might lose their job"

Next

76: Duty to co-operate and communicate information in certain circumstances, or

"Sharing information when setting up a backup plan for financial services (no longer applies)"

Part 3Dispute resolution
Reserve scheme: Appointment of reserve scheme

75Objection to intended recommendation for revocation (Repealed)

    Notes
    • Section 75: repealed, on , by section 39 of the Financial Service Providers (Registration and Dispute Resolution) Amendment Act 2014 (2014 No 34).