Evidence Act 2006

Admissibility rules, privilege, and confidentiality - Hearsay evidence

21: Defendant who does not give evidence in criminal proceeding may not offer own statement

You could also call this:

"If you don't tell the court your side of the story, you can't use something you said or wrote earlier as proof."

Illustration for Evidence Act 2006

If you are a defendant in a court case and you choose not to tell the court what happened, you cannot use a statement you made earlier as evidence. This means you cannot use something you said or wrote before as proof of what you are saying. This rule does not change the rule about statements you made before that are consistent with what you are saying now, which is explained in the previous consistent statement rule.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM393595.


Previous

20: Admissibility in civil proceedings of hearsay statements in documents related to applications, discovery, or interrogatories, or

"Using hearsay in documents for a civil court case if the court rules allow it"


Next

22: Notice of hearsay in criminal proceedings, or

"Telling others you want to use hearsay evidence in a criminal trial"

Part 2Admissibility rules, privilege, and confidentiality
Hearsay evidence

21Defendant who does not give evidence in criminal proceeding may not offer own statement

  1. If a defendant in a criminal proceeding does not give evidence, the defendant may not offer his or her own hearsay statement in evidence in the proceeding.

  2. To avoid any doubt, this section does not limit the previous consistent statement rule.