Evidence Act 2006

Admissibility rules, privilege, and confidentiality - Defendants’ statements, improperly obtained evidence, silence of parties in proceedings, and admissions in civil proceedings

28: Exclusion of unreliable statements

You could also call this:

"When You Said Something, the Judge Decides If It's Reliable Enough to Use in Court"

Illustration for Evidence Act 2006

If you are in a criminal court case, the judge might not let the other side use something you said if it is not reliable. You can ask the judge to think about whether what you said is reliable, or the judge can decide to do this on their own. The judge will only let the other side use what you said if they think it is probably reliable. The judge will look at things like how you were feeling when you made the statement, whether you have any disabilities, what questions you were asked, and whether someone made any threats or promises to you.

If you made a statement and the other side wants to use it to show how you were feeling or thinking at the time, the judge might let them use it even if it is not reliable. You can tell the judge and the other side why you think what you said is not reliable, and the judge will take this into account when deciding what to do. The judge wants to make sure that only reliable information is used in the court case, so they will carefully consider all the factors before making a decision.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM393605.


Previous

27: Defendants’ statements offered by prosecution, or

"When you're accused of a crime, things you say can be used as evidence against you."


Next

29: Exclusion of statements influenced by oppression, or

"When someone was mean or scary to you, a Judge can stop the police from using what you said as evidence."

Part 2Admissibility rules, privilege, and confidentiality
Defendants’ statements, improperly obtained evidence, silence of parties in proceedings, and admissions in civil proceedings

28Exclusion of unreliable statements

  1. This section applies to a criminal proceeding in which the prosecution offers or proposes to offer a statement of a defendant if—

  2. the defendant or, if applicable, a co-defendant against whom the statement is offered raises, on the basis of an evidential foundation, the issue of the reliability of the statement and informs the Judge and the prosecution of the grounds for raising the issue; or
    1. the Judge raises the issue of the reliability of the statement and informs the prosecution of the grounds for raising the issue.
      1. The Judge must exclude the statement unless satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the circumstances in which the statement was made were not likely to have adversely affected its reliability.

      2. However, subsection (2) does not have effect to exclude a statement made by a defendant if the statement is offered only as evidence of the physical, mental, or psychological condition of the defendant at the time the statement was made or as evidence of whether the statement was made.

      3. Without limiting the matters that a Judge may take into account for the purpose of applying subsection (2), the Judge must, in each case, take into account any of the following matters that are relevant to the case:

      4. any pertinent physical, mental, or psychological condition of the defendant when the statement was made (whether apparent or not):
        1. any pertinent characteristics of the defendant including any mental, intellectual, or physical disability to which the defendant is subject (whether apparent or not):
          1. the nature of any questions put to the defendant and the manner and circumstances in which they were put:
            1. the nature of any threat, promise, or representation made to the defendant or any other person.
              Notes
              • Section 28(1)(a): amended, on , by section 7 of the Evidence Amendment Act 2007 (2007 No 24).