Evidence Act 2006

Admissibility rules, privilege, and confidentiality - Defendants’ statements, improperly obtained evidence, silence of parties in proceedings, and admissions in civil proceedings

33: Restrictions on comment on defendant’s right of silence at trial

You could also call this:

"What happens if you stay silent in court"

Illustration for Evidence Act 2006

If you are in a criminal trial, only you, your lawyer, or the Judge can talk about why you did not tell the court your side of the story. Nobody else is allowed to mention that you did not give evidence at your trial. This rule is in place to protect your right to remain silent.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM393615.


Previous

32: Fact-finder not to be invited to infer guilt from defendant’s silence before trial, or

"You can't be thought guilty just because you stayed silent before a trial."


Next

34: Admissions in civil proceedings, or

"What people say or write can be used as evidence in a civil court case"

Part 2Admissibility rules, privilege, and confidentiality
Defendants’ statements, improperly obtained evidence, silence of parties in proceedings, and admissions in civil proceedings

33Restrictions on comment on defendant’s right of silence at trial

  1. In a criminal proceeding, no person other than the defendant or the defendant’s counsel or the Judge may comment on the fact that the defendant did not give evidence at his or her trial.