Copyright Act 1994

Enforcement officers - Provisions relating to things seized

134U: Application for order to return things seized

You could also call this:

"Getting back things that were taken from you"

Illustration for Copyright Act 1994

You can apply to the court to get something back that was seized if you think it belongs to you. The court can order the thing to be returned to you if it is satisfied you are the rightful owner. The court also considers if keeping the thing is fair, looking at how serious the alleged offence is and how keeping it affects you. You can make an application to the court and it will look at the situation. The court thinks about how important the thing is as evidence and if there are other ways to keep its value. It also considers if keeping the thing will cause you loss or damage. The court makes a decision based on what is fair and just, considering all the factors. You can find more information about the law that allows you to make this application in the Copyright Amendment Act 2011. The court's decision is final and it will decide what happens to the seized thing.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM4127229.

This page was last updated on View changes


Previous

134T: Period things seized may be retained, or

"How long police can keep things they take during a copyright investigation"


Next

134V: Disposal of things seized, or

"What happens to things taken by the police because of a crime?"

Part 6AEnforcement officers
Provisions relating to things seized

134UApplication for order to return things seized

  1. A person who claims to be entitled to a thing seized may apply to the court for an order that the thing be delivered to him or her.

  2. On an application under subsection (1), the court may make an order for delivery of the thing to the applicant if it is satisfied—

  3. that the applicant is the person entitled to it; and
    1. that it would be contrary to the interests of justice for the thing to be retained, having regard to—
      1. the gravity of the alleged offence in respect of which the thing is being retained; and
        1. any loss or damage to the applicant caused, or likely to be caused, by retention of the thing; and
          1. the likely evidential value of the thing, having regard to any other evidence held by the Commissioner of Police or the chief executive, as the case may be; and
            1. whether the evidential value of the thing can be adequately preserved by means other than its retention.
            Notes
            • Section 134U: inserted, on , by section 6 of the Copyright Amendment Act 2011 (2011 No 72).