Senior Courts Act 2016

Senior court Judges - Eligibility for appointment

98: Eligibility for appointment as President of Court of Appeal

You could also call this:

"Who can be the boss of the Court of Appeal"

Illustration for Senior Courts Act 2016

You can be appointed the President of the Court of Appeal if you are a High Court Judge. You can also be appointed if you are made a High Court Judge at the same time as being appointed the President. If you are a Supreme Court Judge and become the President of the Court of Appeal, you will stop being a Supreme Court Judge. You might still have some work to finish from when you were a Supreme Court Judge. You can keep working on those cases to finish them, even after you stop being a Supreme Court Judge. This means you can still make decisions and give judgments on cases you were already working on.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM6143305.

This page was last updated on View changes


Previous

97: Eligibility for appointment as Chief High Court Judge, or

"Who can be the Chief High Court Judge"


Next

99: Eligibility for appointment as Chief Justice, or

"Who can be the Chief Justice"

Part 5Senior court Judges
Eligibility for appointment

98Eligibility for appointment as President of Court of Appeal

  1. A person may only be appointed the President of the Court of Appeal if that person is—

  2. a High Court Judge; or
    1. appointed a High Court Judge at the same time as being appointed the President of the Court of Appeal.
      1. If a person who is a Supreme Court Judge is appointed the President of the Court of Appeal, the person immediately ceases to hold office as a Supreme Court Judge.

      2. A person who ceases to hold office as a Supreme Court Judge under subsection (2) may nevertheless continue in that office to determine, give judgment in, or otherwise complete a proceeding heard by that person (either alone or with others) when he or she sat in the Supreme Court.