Fair Trading Act 1986

5D: No contracting out: exception for parties in trade

You could also call this:

“Trading businesses can agree to different rules if it's fair”

You can make an agreement with someone else in business to do things that might normally break the rules about being fair in trade. This is allowed if you follow certain rules:

  1. Your agreement must be written down.

  2. You must both be buying and selling things as part of your business.

  3. Everyone involved in the agreement must be in business and agree to not follow the usual fair trading rules.

  4. It must be fair and reasonable for you to make this kind of agreement.

If someone needs to decide if your agreement is fair, they will look at things like what the agreement is about, how much money is involved, and whether both sides had a fair chance to negotiate. They’ll also check if anyone knew they were breaking the rules, and if you got advice from a lawyer.

Even if you make this kind of agreement, the Fair Trading Commission can still take you to court if you break the law. Also, other rules about contracts still apply to your agreement.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM6156603.

Topics:
Business > Fair trading
Money and consumer rights > Consumer protection

Previous

5C: No contracting out: general rule, or

“Rules in this law apply no matter what, even if you make a different agreement”


Next

6: Functions of Commission in relation to dissemination of information, or

“Commission's job is to help people understand buying and selling rules”

5DNo contracting out: exception for parties in trade

  1. Despite section 5C(1) and (2), if the requirements of subsection (3) are satisfied, parties to an agreement may include a provision in their agreement that will, or may (whether directly or indirectly), allow those parties to engage in conduct, or to make representations, that would otherwise contravene section 9, 12A, 13, or 14(1); and in that case,—

  2. the provision is enforceable; and
    1. no proceedings may be brought by any party to the agreement for an order under section 43 in relation to such a contravention of section 9, 12A, 13, or 14(1).
      1. A provision of the kind referred to in subsection (1) includes, for example,—

      2. a clause commonly known as an entire agreement clause:
        1. a clause that acknowledges that a party to the agreement does not rely on the representations or other conduct of another party to the agreement, whether during negotiations prior to the agreement being entered into, or at any subsequent time.
          1. The requirements referred to in subsection (1) are that—

          2. the agreement is in writing; and
            1. the goods, services, or interest in land are both supplied and acquired in trade; and
              1. all parties to the agreement—
                1. are in trade; and
                  1. agree to contract out of section 9, 12A, 13, or 14(1); and
                  2. it is fair and reasonable that the parties are bound by the provision in the agreement.
                    1. If, in any case, a court is required to decide what is fair and reasonable for the purposes of subsection (3)(d), the court must take account of all the circumstances of the agreement, including—

                    2. the subject matter of the agreement; and
                      1. the value of the goods, services, or interest in land; and
                        1. the respective bargaining power of the parties, including—
                          1. the extent to which a party was able to negotiate the terms of the agreement; and
                            1. whether a party was required to either accept or reject the agreement on the terms and conditions presented by the other party; and
                            2. whether the party seeking to rely on the effectiveness of a provision of the kind referred to in subsection (1) knew that a representation made in connection with the agreement would, but for that provision, have breached section 12A, 13, or 14(1); and
                              1. whether all or any of the parties received advice from, or were represented by, a lawyer, either at the time of the negotiations leading to the agreement or at any other relevant time.
                                1. To avoid doubt, nothing in this section—

                                2. prevents the Commission from bringing proceedings for an offence under this Act (including an offence under section 12A, 13, or 14(1)) against a party to the agreement referred to in subsection (1):
                                  1. limits the application of subpart 3 of Part 2 of the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017.
                                    Notes
                                    • Section 5D: inserted, on , by section 8 of the Fair Trading Amendment Act 2013 (2013 No 143).
                                    • Section 5D(5)(b): amended, on , by section 347 of the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 (2017 No 5).