Plain language law

New Zealand law explained for everyone

Plain Language Law homepage
378A: Order for retrial may be granted if acquittal tainted
or “A new trial can happen if someone was found not guilty because of cheating or tricks in the first trial.”

You could also call this:

“This section explained the meanings of words used in other parts of the law, but it's no longer in use.”

The section you are asking about has been removed from the law. It used to explain some words used in sections 378C and 378D of the Crimes Act 1961. These sections were about trying people again who had been found not guilty before. The government took this part out of the law on 1 July 2013. This means that these words are no longer officially explained in this part of the act.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.


Next up: 378C: Consent of Solicitor-General required in certain circumstances for exercise of powers in relation to acquitted person

or “The law says you need to get permission from a special lawyer before looking into someone who was found not guilty before.”

Part 12 Procedure
Retrials of previously acquitted persons

378BMeaning of terms used in sections 378C and 378D (Repealed)

    Notes
    • Section 378B: repealed, on , by section 6 of the Crimes Amendment Act (No 4) 2011 (2011 No 85).