Crimes Act 1961

Obtaining evidence by interception devices - General provisions

312N: Restriction on admissibility of evidence of private communications lawfully intercepted

You could also call this:

“Rules about using secret recordings as proof in court”

This part of the law used to talk about when you could use certain types of private conversations as evidence. However, this rule doesn’t exist anymore. It was removed from the Crimes Act 1961 on 18 April 2012. The rule that replaced it is now in a different law called the Search and Surveillance Act 2012.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM330998.

Topics:
Crime and justice > Criminal law
Crime and justice > Courts and legal help

Previous

312M: Inadmissibility of evidence of private communications unlawfully intercepted, or

“You can't use secretly recorded private conversations as proof in court if they were recorded illegally.”


Next

312O: Privileged evidence, or

“This rule used to protect certain information from being used in court, but it no longer applies.”

Part 11A Obtaining evidence by interception devices
General provisions

312NRestriction on admissibility of evidence of private communications lawfully intercepted (Repealed)

    Notes
    • Section 312N: repealed, on , by section 325(9) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24).