Plain language law

New Zealand law explained for everyone

 Plain Language Law homepage
Back to
111: False statements or declarations
or “You can get in big trouble for lying when you're supposed to tell the truth to important people.”
You could also call this:

“This law says you need more than one person's word to prove someone lied in court or made a false statement.”

You can’t be found guilty of perjury or any crime related to lying under oath or making false statements based on what only one person says. For a conviction, there needs to be more evidence than just one person’s word. This extra evidence must support the main witness’s story in some important way that shows you were involved.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

Next up: 113: Fabricating evidence

or “Making fake proof to trick a court or judge is against the law and can get you in big trouble.”
Next

Part 6 Crimes affecting the administration of law and justice
Misleading justice

112Evidence of perjury, false oath, or false statement

  1. No one shall be convicted of perjury, or of any offence against section 110 or section 111, on the evidence of 1 witness only, unless the evidence of that witness is corroborated in some material particular by evidence implicating the defendant.

Compare
  • 1908 No 32 s 134
Notes
  • Section 112: amended, on , by section 6 of the Crimes Amendment Act (No 4) 2011 (2011 No 85).