Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017

Contracts legislation - Contractual privity

18: Availability of defences

You could also call this:

“The person being sued can defend themselves just like they would against the original person they made a promise to”

If you take someone to court because they promised to do something for you, they can defend themselves in certain ways. They can use any defence they would have had if you were part of the original agreement. They can also defend themselves as if you were the person they made the promise to directly.

The person you’re taking to court can use defences, counterclaims, or set-offs against you. But if they want to use a set-off or counterclaim that wasn’t part of the original agreement, they can only do this if it’s related to that agreement.

If the person you’re taking to court makes a counterclaim against you, you won’t have to pay anything unless you choose to continue with your claim against them. If you do continue, you won’t have to pay more than what you would have gained from their promise.

Remember, the person you’re taking to court can only use these defences if you’re claiming something based on a promise they made to benefit you, even though you weren’t part of the original agreement.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM6844071.


Previous

17: Enforcement by beneficiary, or

"How you can make someone keep a promise they made about you in a contract"


Next

19: This subpart does not apply to promises, contracts, or deeds governed by foreign law, or

"This part of New Zealand law doesn't apply to agreements made using other countries' rules"

Part 2 Contracts legislation
Contractual privity

18Availability of defences

  1. This section applies only if, in a proceeding brought in a court, a claim is made in reliance on this subpart by a beneficiary against a promisor.

  2. The promisor has available, by way of defence, counterclaim, set-off, or otherwise, any matter that would have been available to the promisor—

  3. if the beneficiary had been a party to the deed or contract in which the promise is contained; or
    1. if—
      1. the beneficiary were the promisee; and
        1. the promise to which the proceeding relates had been made for the benefit of the promisee; and
          1. the proceeding had been brought by the promisee.
          2. However, a set-off or counterclaim against the promisee is available under subsection (2) against the beneficiary only if the subject matter of the set-off or counterclaim arises out of, or in connection with, the deed or contract in which the promise is contained.

          3. In a counterclaim brought under subsection (2) or (3) against a beneficiary,—

          4. the beneficiary is not liable on the counterclaim, unless the beneficiary elects, with full knowledge of the counterclaim, to proceed with the beneficiary’s claim against the promisor; and
            1. if the beneficiary so elects to proceed, the beneficiary’s liability on the counterclaim may not exceed the value of the benefit conferred on the beneficiary by the promise.
              1. Subsections (2) and (3) are subject to subsection (4).

              Compare