Human Rights Act 1993

Human Rights Review Tribunal - Procedure of Tribunal

122: Stating case for High Court

You could also call this:

"Asking the High Court for its opinion on a law question"

Illustration for Human Rights Act 1993

You can ask the High Court for its opinion on a question of law. The Tribunal can do this at any time during a hearing. It can also do this on its own or if a party to the proceedings asks it to. You might question the validity of a regulation during a Tribunal hearing. If so, the Tribunal must ask the High Court for its opinion or move the proceedings to the High Court. It will do this unless it thinks there is no good argument for the regulation being invalid. If the Tribunal wants to ask the High Court for its opinion, it will tell the parties involved. It will say which High Court registry the case will be filed in. The parties will usually work together to prepare the question for the High Court. If they cannot agree, the Tribunal will decide. If the Tribunal is asking the High Court for its opinion on its own, it will prepare the question itself. The High Court will then hear the question and give its opinion to the Tribunal.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM305441.

This page was last updated on View changes


Previous

121C: Online publication of final written decisions, or

"Tribunal decisions are published online for the public to see."


Next

122A: Removal to High Court of proceedings or issue, or

"Asking the High Court to Take Over a Case"

Part 4Human Rights Review Tribunal
Procedure of Tribunal

122Stating case for High Court

  1. The Tribunal may, at any time, before or during the hearing or before delivering its decision, on the application of any party to the proceedings or of its own motion, state a case for the opinion of the High Court on any question of law arising in any proceedings before the Tribunal.

  2. If, in any proceedings before the Tribunal, the validity of any regulation is questioned, the Tribunal must, unless it considers that there is no arguable case in support of the contention that the regulation is invalid, either—

  3. state a case for the opinion of the High Court on the relevant question or questions of law; or
    1. if the leave of the High Court is obtained, order, under section 122A(1), that the proceedings before it or the relevant matter or matters at issue be removed to the High Court for determination.
      1. The Tribunal shall give notice to the parties to the proceedings of the Tribunal's intention to state a case under this section, specifying the registry of the High Court in which the case is to be filed.

      2. Except where the Tribunal intends to state the case of its own motion, the question shall be in the form of a special case drawn up by the parties to the proceedings, and, if the parties do not agree, to be settled by the Tribunal.

      3. Where the Tribunal intends to state the case of its own motion, it shall itself state and sign a case setting forth the facts and questions of law arising for the determination of the High Court.

      4. The High Court shall hear and determine any question submitted to it under this section, and shall remit the case with its opinion to the Tribunal.

      Compare
      • 1977 No 49 s 62
      Notes
      • Section 122(1A): inserted, on , by section 26 of the Human Rights Amendment Act 2001 (2001 No 96).