Health and Safety at Work Act 2015

Enforcement and other matters - Criminal proceedings - Limitation periods for prosecutions

147: Extension of time if regulator needs longer to decide whether to bring prosecution

You could also call this:

“Regulator can ask court for more time to decide on charges”

If the regulator thinks they won’t be able to file a charging document within 12 months, they can ask the District Court for more time. This extra time can be up to 12 more months.

The court will only give more time if:

  • The regulator really needs longer to decide about filing a charging document
  • The investigation is complicated or takes a long time
  • It’s in the public’s best interest to allow more time
  • Giving more time won’t make it unfair for the person who might be charged

Before deciding, the court will listen to the regulator, the person who might be charged, and anyone else who has a stake in whether a charging document is filed. These other people are described in section 142(1).

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM6544156.


Previous

146: Limitation period for prosecutions brought by regulator, or

"Time limits for regulators to prosecute health and safety law breaches"


Next

148: Limitation period for private prosecutions, or

"Time limits for non-regulators to start legal action for health and safety offences"

Part 4 Enforcement and other matters
Criminal proceedings: Limitation periods for prosecutions

147Extension of time if regulator needs longer to decide whether to bring prosecution

  1. This section applies if the regulator considers that it will not be able to file a charging document by the end of the 12-month period specified in section 146(1)(a).

  2. The District Court may, on application by the regulator made before the end of the 12-month period specified in section 146(1)(a), extend the time available for filing a charging document for a further period not exceeding 12 months from the date of expiry of the 12-month period specified in section 146(1)(a).

  3. The court must not grant an extension under subsection (2) unless it is satisfied that—

  4. the regulator reasonably requires longer than the 12-month period to decide whether to file a charging document; and
    1. the reason for requiring the longer period is that the investigation of the events and issues surrounding the alleged offence is complex or time consuming; and
      1. it is in the public interest in the circumstances that a charging document is able to be filed after the 12-month period expires; and
        1. filing the charging document after the 12-month period expires will not unfairly prejudice the proposed defendant in defending the charge.
          1. The court must give the following persons an opportunity to be heard:

          2. the regulator:
            1. the proposed defendant:
              1. any other person who has an interest in whether or not a charging document should be filed, being a person described in section 142(1).
                Compare