Income Tax Act 2007

Deductions - Specific rules for expenditure types

DB 22: Amounts paid for non-compliance and change in use

You could also call this:

“Money back for landlords who repair property after receiving income for non-compliance”

You can get money back for repairs if you’re a landlord who received money because someone didn’t follow the rules about fixing things. This applies if you got money that counts as income because someone didn’t fix something they were supposed to.

If you get this money, and in the same year or the next four years, you don’t use the land to make money but still own it, you might be able to claim some money back. This is true if you spend money to look after the land or fix things on it, like painting or general maintenance.

You can only claim this money back if you would have been allowed to if you were using the land to make money, and if no other part of the law lets you claim it back.

The amount you can claim back is either how much you spent on repairs, or how much of the money you got that counts as income in the year you did the repairs, whichever is less.

This rule adds to the general rules about what you can claim, but you still have to follow all the other rules about claiming money back.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM1513622.

Topics:
Money and consumer rights > Taxes
Housing and property > Renting

Previous

DB 21: Amounts paid for non-compliance with covenant for repair, or

“Tax deductions for repair payments due to broken lease agreements”


Next

DB 22B: Amounts paid for commercial fit-out for building, or

“How to treat costs for business-related building interiors”

Part D Deductions
Specific rules for expenditure types

DB 22Amounts paid for non-compliance and change in use

  1. This section applies when—

  2. a person who is a lessor receives an amount for non-compliance with a covenant for repair that is assessable income under section CC 2 (Non-compliance with covenant for repair); and
    1. in the income year in which the lessor receives the amount or in any of the following 4 income years,—
      1. the lessor does not use the land to which the amount relates to derive assessable income, but continues to own the land; and
        1. the lessor incurs expenditure in maintaining the land or in making repairs to improvements on the land, including painting and general maintenance; and
          1. the lessor would have been allowed a deduction if the land had been used for the purpose of deriving assessable income; and
            1. in the absence of section DB 46, no other provision of this Act would allow the lessor a deduction for the expenditure.
            2. The lessor is allowed a deduction for the expenditure.

            3. The amount of the deduction is the lesser of—

            4. the amount of the expenditure; and
              1. the part of the amount that is assessable income derived by the lessor in the income year in which the expenditure is incurred through the operation of—
                1. section CC 2; or
                  1. section EI 5 (Amount paid to lessor for non-compliance with covenant for repair); or
                    1. section EI 6 (Amount paid for non-compliance: when lessor ceases to own land).
                    2. This section supplements the general permission. The general limitations still apply.

                    Compare