Plain language law

New Zealand law explained for everyone

 Plain Language Law homepage
Back to
284: Court supervision of liquidation
or “How the court can oversee and assist with company liquidations”
You could also call this:

“What counts as not following the rules for liquidators”

In section 286, ‘failure to comply’ means when you don’t follow a law, rule, or court order that applies to you as a liquidator. This could be any law, rule, or order that you need to follow when doing your job as a liquidator.

If there’s a case in court about this, there are two important things to know. First, if a District Court or High Court has already found that you didn’t follow the rules in another case about breaking this law or any other law, that finding can be used as evidence in the new case. Second, to prove this finding, someone can show a document with the court’s official seal on it.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

Next up: 286: Orders to enforce liquidator's duties

or “Court can order liquidators to do their job properly or remove them”
Next

Part 16 Liquidations
Appointment and supervision of liquidators

285Meaning of failure to comply

  1. In section 286, failure to comply means a person’s failure to comply with an enactment, a rule of law, or a court order to the extent that the enactment, rule, or order applies to the person in the person's capacity as a liquidator.

  2. In proceedings under section 286,—

  3. a finding of any fact made in proceedings before the District Court or High Court for an offence under this Act or any other enactment that there was a failure to comply is prima facie evidence of that fact:
    1. a finding described in paragraph (a) may be proved by production of a document under the seal of the court in which the finding was made.

      Compare
      Notes
      • Section 285: replaced, on , by section 51 of the Insolvency Practitioners Regulation (Amendments) Act 2019 (2019 No 28).