Plain language law

New Zealand law explained for everyone

 Plain Language Law homepage
Back to
239AMB: Further powers where court orders creditor’s vote be taken into account
or “Court can make decisions about creditor votes and company meetings”
You could also call this:

“Court can change voting outcome if related creditor influenced result”

If you’re at a meeting where people vote on something important for a company that’s having money troubles, there are special rules. Sometimes, someone who votes might be closely connected to the company. We call this person a ‘related creditor’.

After the meeting, if the person in charge (called the administrator) finds out that a related creditor voted, they need to check if that vote should have been ignored. If ignoring that vote would have changed the result, the administrator needs to tell everyone about it right away.

Even if the related creditor’s vote should have been ignored, the result of the vote still counts unless a court says otherwise. The court can make different decisions about what should happen next. They might say the vote doesn’t count, or that everyone needs to vote again. They could also stop certain people from voting next time.

If the administrator doesn’t tell everyone about the related creditor’s vote when they should have, they might get in trouble with the law.

Remember, these rules are there to make sure that votes about a company’s future are fair and that people closely connected to the company don’t have too much say.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

Next up: 239AN: Administrator must call first creditors' meeting

or “Administrator must organise a quick meeting with people the company owes money to”
Next

Part 15A Voluntary administration
Creditors' meetings generally

239AMCPower of court where outcome of voting at creditors’ meeting determined by related creditor

  1. This section applies in relation to a resolution at a creditors’ meeting if,—

  2. after the meeting, the administrator becomes aware that a creditor that voted on the resolution is a related creditor; and
    1. the administrator is satisfied that,—
      1. in accordance with section 239AM or 239AMA, the related creditor’s vote should have been disregarded; and
        1. the resolution would not have been passed, defeated, or required to be decided by a casting vote (as the case may be) if the vote cast by the related creditor (or, if there is more than 1 related creditor, the votes cast by the related creditors) had been disregarded.

        2. Despite sections 239AM(1) and 239AMA(1), the outcome of the vote on the resolution is valid and effective unless the court orders otherwise under subsection (4).

        3. The administrator must, as soon as practicable after becoming aware that this section applies to the resolution, give notice of that fact to every known creditor.

        4. The court may, on the application of the administrator or a creditor,—

        5. order that the resolution be set aside or treated as having passed:
          1. order that a new meeting be held to consider and vote on the resolution:
            1. order that a specified related creditor or creditors must not vote on the resolution or on a resolution to vary or amend it:
              1. make any other orders that the court thinks necessary.

                1. An administrator who fails to comply with subsection (3) commits an offence and is liable on conviction to the penalty set out in section 373(2).

                Notes
                • Section 239AMC: inserted, on , by section 13 of the Insolvency Practitioners Regulation (Amendments) Act 2019 (2019 No 28).