Incorporated Societies Act 2022

Administration of societies - Committee and officers - Conflict of interest disclosure rules

68: Avoidance of transactions

You could also call this:

"Stopping a deal if someone in charge benefits from it"

Illustration for Incorporated Societies Act 2022

You can stop a deal made by the society if an officer has an interest in it. You can do this within 3 months after the deal is notified under section 65(1). However, you cannot stop the deal if the society gets a fair price for it, as explained in section 69. You can only stop a deal because of an officer’s interest if you follow this rule. A society’s rules cannot override this law and allow a deal to be stopped in other circumstances. If a society’s rules try to do this, those rules are not valid. If you want to know more about similar laws, you can look at the 1993 No 105 s 141(1), (2), (6) law.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=LMS100945.

This page was last updated on View changes


Previous

67: Constitution may negate, limit, or modify conflict of interest requirements, or

"Your society's rules can change or cancel some conflict of interest requirements."


Next

69: What is fair value, or

"What makes a fair deal for a society?"

Part 3Administration of societies
Committee and officers: Conflict of interest disclosure rules

68Avoidance of transactions

  1. A transaction entered into by the society in which an officer of the society is interested may be avoided by the society at any time before the expiry of 3 months after the transaction is notified under section 65(1).

  2. However, a transaction cannot be avoided if the society receives fair value under it (see section 69).

  3. A transaction in which an officer is interested can only be avoided on the ground of the officer’s interest in accordance with this section.

  4. A provision of a constitution is of no effect to the extent that it purports to allow a transaction to be avoided in circumstances in which the transaction could not otherwise be avoided under this Act.

Compare