Plain language law

New Zealand law explained for everyone

 Plain Language Law homepage
Back to
100: Apology not admissible except for assessment of remedies
or “An apology for privacy issues can't be used as evidence, except when deciding compensation”
You could also call this:

“Who must prove they didn't break privacy rules when there's an exception”

If someone says they didn’t break privacy rules because of a special exception in the Privacy Act 2020 or a code of practice, they have to prove it. This means that if you take them to court because you think they interfered with your privacy, they need to show evidence that their actions were allowed under the law. You don’t have to prove that they’re not covered by an exception - it’s their job to prove that they are.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

Next up: 102: Remedies in respect of interference with privacy

or “What the Tribunal can do if someone interferes with your privacy”
Next

Part 5 Complaints, investigations, and proceedings
Proceedings before Human Rights Review Tribunal: Proceedings in relation to complaints or investigations

101Onus of proof

  1. If any provision of this Act, or any code of practice, excepts or exempts any action from being an interference with the privacy of an individual, the defendant has the onus of proving that exception or exemption in any proceedings under this Part.

Compare