Armed Forces Discipline Act 1971

Miscellaneous provisions - Courts of inquiry

200L: Interpreters and recorders

You could also call this:

"Help with language or recording in court"

Illustration for Armed Forces Discipline Act 1971

You can have a person to help with language or recording at a court of inquiry. This person can interpret languages or record what people say. They can be chosen by the person in charge of the court or the person running the inquiry. You need to make sure this person is fair and good at their job. Before they start, they must promise to tell the truth. This promise is called an oath. If the person does not want to swear an oath, they can make a solemn affirmation instead. This means they promise to tell the truth in a way that is important to them. Making a solemn affirmation is just as important as swearing an oath.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM2105134.

This page was last updated on View changes


Previous

200K: Collecting and recording of evidence, or

"Gathering and writing down information to help find the truth"


Next

200M: Procedure if conduct of superior officer may be in question, or

"What happens if a senior officer's behaviour is questioned during a court inquiry?"

Part 11Miscellaneous provisions
Courts of inquiry

200LInterpreters and recorders

  1. A competent and impartial person or persons may be appointed at any time during the course of the inquiry by either the assembling authority or the president to act as interpreter, shorthand writer, typist, or operator of a recording machine to assist the court in collecting and recording the evidence.

  2. Before an interpreter commences his or her duties, a member must administer an oath to the interpreter in the form and manner prescribed by the Chief of Defence Force.

  3. If an interpreter objects to being sworn, or it is not reasonably practicable to administer an oath to that person in a manner appropriate to his or her religious belief, the person may be permitted to make a solemn affirmation instead of swearing an oath.

  4. The making of an affirmation under subsection (3) has the same force and effect, and has the same consequences, as the taking of an oath.

Notes
  • Section 200L: inserted, on , by section 68 of the Armed Forces Discipline Amendment Act (No 2) 2007 (2007 No 98).