Armed Forces Discipline Act 1971

Special provisions for dealing with mentally impaired persons

188A: Determining if accused unfit to stand trial

You could also call this:

"Deciding if someone is well enough to go to court"

Illustration for Armed Forces Discipline Act 1971

You are accused of a crime in the Armed Forces. The Court Martial must decide if you are fit to stand trial. They need to hear from at least two health assessors about your mental health. If the Court thinks you are mentally impaired, they will record this and decide if you are fit to stand trial. You and the prosecutor can give your views and present evidence. The Court will then decide if you are fit to stand trial and record their decision. If the Court decides you are fit to stand trial, the trial will continue. The Court can make these decisions without you being there if they think you are too mentally impaired. They must be satisfied by medical evidence that you cannot be brought to court. The Court can also use section 188 to make these decisions. The Court must be at least 50% sure of their decision. This is called the balance of probabilities.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM404018.

This page was last updated on View changes


Previous

188: When Court may find accused unfit to stand trial, or

"When the Court decides you're too unwell for a trial"


Next

188B: Court Martial may postpone finding as to unfitness to stand trial, or

"Court Martial can delay deciding if someone is fit to stand trial"

Part 10Special provisions for dealing with mentally impaired persons

188ADetermining if accused unfit to stand trial

  1. In order to determine whether an accused is unfit to stand trial, the Court Martial must receive the evidence of at least 2 health assessors as to whether the accused is mentally impaired.

  2. If the Court is satisfied on the evidence given under subsection (1) that the accused is mentally impaired, the Court must record a finding to that effect and—

  3. give the prosecutor and the accused an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence as to whether the accused is unfit to stand trial; and
    1. find whether the accused is unfit to stand trial; and
      1. record the finding made under paragraph (b).
        1. If the Court records a finding under subsection (2) that the accused is fit to stand trial, the Court must continue the proceedings.

        2. Repealed
        3. The standard of proof required for a finding under this section is the balance of probabilities.

        4. The jurisdiction conferred on the Court Martial by this section and by section 188 may be exercised by the Court in the absence of the accused if the Court is satisfied by medical evidence that the accused is too mentally impaired to be brought before the Court Martial.

        Notes
        • Section 188A: inserted, on , by section 51 of the Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003 (2003 No 115).
        • Section 188A(1): amended, on , by section 15(1) of the Military Justice Legislation Amendment Act 2018 (2018 No 36).
        • Section 188A(1): amended, on , by section 15(2) of the Military Justice Legislation Amendment Act 2018 (2018 No 36).
        • Section 188A(2): amended, on , by section 60(2) of the Armed Forces Discipline Amendment Act (No 2) 2007 (2007 No 98).
        • Section 188A(3): inserted, on , by section 15(3) of the Military Justice Legislation Amendment Act 2018 (2018 No 36).
        • Section 188A(3): repealed, on , by section 60(3) of the Armed Forces Discipline Amendment Act (No 2) 2007 (2007 No 98).
        • Section 188A(5): amended, on , by section 60(4)(a) of the Armed Forces Discipline Amendment Act (No 2) 2007 (2007 No 98).
        • Section 188A(5): amended, on , by section 60(4)(b) of the Armed Forces Discipline Amendment Act (No 2) 2007 (2007 No 98).