This page is about a bill. That means that it's not the law yet, but some people want it to be the law. It could change quickly, and some of the information is just a draft.

Planning Bill

Foundations - Duties and restrictions - Existing uses

20: Certain existing land uses allowed

You could also call this:

"You can keep using land in a way that was allowed before new rules started."

Illustration for Planning Bill

You can use land in a way that does not follow a new rule if you were already using it that way before the rule started. The use must have been allowed or lawful before the rule came into force. The effects of the use must be the same or similar to what they were before. You can also use land in a way that does not follow a new rule if it was allowed because of a designation that has since been removed. The effects of the use must still be the same or similar to what they were before the designation was removed. This does not apply if you stopped using the land for more than 12 months or if you make changes that increase the impact of the use. Note that this section does not apply to uses controlled under the Natural Environment Act 2025, such as section 18 or 19 of the Natural Environment Act 2025. When a rule 'came into force', it means the rule started or became operative. This can be different depending on the type of rule, such as a national rule or a rule in a plan.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=LMS1549194.

This page was last updated on View changes


Previous

19: Subdivision authorised by certain other Acts not restricted, or

"Some land subdivisions are still allowed, even if they don't follow the usual rules."


Next

21: Extensions where existing land use discontinued, or

"Asking to keep using land in a way that's not allowed if you've already stopped using it that way"

Part 2Foundations
Duties and restrictions: Existing uses

20Certain existing land uses allowed

  1. A person may, without a planning consent, use land in a manner that contravenes a national rule, a rule in a plan, or a rule in a proposed plan that has legal effect if,—

  2. before the rule came into force, the use—
    1. was a permitted activity or otherwise could have been lawfully carried out without a planning consent; and
      1. was lawfully established; and
      2. the effects of the use are the same or similar in character, intensity, and scale to those that existed before the rule came into force.
        1. A person may, without a planning consent, use land in a manner that contravenes a national rule, a rule in a plan, or a rule in a proposed plan that has legal effect if—

        2. the use was lawfully established by way of a designation; and
          1. the designation has since been removed; and
            1. the effects of the use are the same or similar in character, intensity, and scale to those that existed before the designation was removed.
              1. Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply to a use of land if—

              2. the use has been discontinued for a continuous period of more than 12 months at any time after the rule came into force unless an extension granted under section 21 applies; or
                1. any reconstruction, alteration, or extension of or to any building increases the extent to which the use contravenes the rule; or
                  1. the use is of the surface of water in a lake or river.
                    1. To avoid doubt, this section does not apply to a use of land that is controlled or restricted under section 18 or 19 of the Natural Environment Act 2025.

                    2. In this section, came into force,—

                    3. in relation to a national rule, means the rule commenced; and
                      1. in relation to a rule in a plan, means the rule became operative; and
                        1. in relation to a rule in a proposed plan, means the rule had legal effect.