Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013

Disclosure of offers of financial products - Procedure for making regulated offers - Expiry

86: Director not liable if no misconduct or negligence

You could also call this:

"Directors are not in trouble if they did nothing wrong and didn't neglect their job."

Illustration for Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013

If you are a director, you are not liable under section 85(5) if you can prove that you did not repay money because of something that was not your fault. You must show that you did not do anything wrong or neglect your duties. If you can prove this, you will not be liable, and you can find more information about this in section 85(5).

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM4702193.


Previous

85: How offeror must deal with applications on expiry, or

"What happens to your application when a financial product offer ends"


Next

87: Money for financial products must be held in trust, or

"Your money is safe when you buy financial products because sellers must look after it until you get what you paid for."

Part 3Disclosure of offers of financial products
Procedure for making regulated offers: Expiry

86Director not liable if no misconduct or negligence

  1. A director is not liable under section 85(5) if he or she proves that the default in the repayment of the money was not due to any misconduct or negligence on his or her part.