Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013

Enforcement, liability, and appeals - Miscellaneous - Accessories and attribution of liability

535: State of mind of directors, employees, or agents attributed to body corporate or other principal

You could also call this:

"A company or person is responsible if someone in their team was thinking a certain way when they did something wrong."

Illustration for Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013

When you are trying to figure out if a company or person is responsible for something under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013, you need to understand what they were thinking. If a company did something wrong, it is enough to show that one of its directors, employees, or agents was thinking a certain way when they did it. This person must have been acting within their job description or what you would normally expect them to do. You can think of this like a big team effort, where the team's actions are linked to what the team members were thinking.

If it is not a company, but a person who did something wrong, you still need to understand what they were thinking. It is enough to show that one of their employees or agents was thinking a certain way when they did it. This employee or agent must have been acting within their job description or what you would normally expect them to do.

When we talk about what someone was thinking, we mean things like what they knew, what they wanted to do, what they believed, or why they wanted to do something. You can find more information about this by looking at the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 and similar laws, such as the one mentioned here. This can help you understand how the law works in New Zealand.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM4679204.


Previous

534: Directors treated as having contravened in case of defective disclosure, financial reporting contravention, or climate-related disclosure contravention, or

"Directors can get in trouble if their company doesn't follow the rules about sharing important information."


Next

536: Conduct of directors, employees, or agents attributed to body corporate or other principal, or

"What company staff do can be seen as the company's actions too"

Part 8Enforcement, liability, and appeals
Miscellaneous: Accessories and attribution of liability

535State of mind of directors, employees, or agents attributed to body corporate or other principal

  1. If, in a proceeding under this Act in respect of any conduct engaged in by a body corporate, being conduct in relation to which any provision of this Act applies, it is necessary to establish the state of mind of the body corporate, it is sufficient to show that a director, employee, or agent of the body corporate, acting within the scope of his or her actual or apparent authority, had that state of mind.

  2. If, in a proceeding (other than a proceeding for an offence) under this Act in respect of any conduct engaged in by a person other than a body corporate, being conduct in relation to which any provision of this Act applies, it is necessary to establish the state of mind of the person, it is sufficient to show that an employee or agent of the person, acting within the scope of his or her actual or apparent authority, had that state of mind.

  3. In this Act, state of mind, in relation to a person, includes the knowledge, intention, opinion, belief, or purpose of the person and the person's reasons for that intention, opinion, belief, or purpose.

Compare