Intelligence and Security Act 2017

Accessing information held by other agencies - Direct access to database information

132: Review of agreements

You could also call this:

"Ministers must check agreements every 3 years to ensure they are fair."

Illustration for Intelligence and Security Act 2017

When you enter into an agreement, the Ministers who made the agreement must look at it again every 3 years. They must talk to the Privacy Commissioner and the Inspector-General when they do this. You can think of the Privacy Commissioner and the Inspector-General as people who help make sure the agreement is fair.

The Ministers must also think about any comments they get from the Privacy Commissioner and the Inspector-General. This means they have to consider what these people say about the agreement. The Ministers have to do this as part of their review of the agreement.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM6921152.


Previous

131: Publication of direct access agreements, or

"Agreements about sharing secret information are published online so you can see what they say"


Next

133: Relationship between subpart and other law, or

"How this law works with other laws that let you share information"

Part 5Accessing information held by other agencies
Direct access to database information

132Review of agreements

  1. The Ministers who have entered into an agreement must review the agreement every 3 years.

  2. In conducting a review, the Ministers must—

  3. consult—
    1. the Privacy Commissioner; and
      1. the Inspector-General; and
      2. have regard to any comments received from—
        1. the Privacy Commissioner; and
          1. the Inspector-General.