Crown Minerals Act 1991

Permits, access to land, and other matters - Permits, access to land, and title notations - Access to land other than for minimum impact activity

69: Procedure

You could also call this:

"How the person in charge makes fair decisions at a hearing"

Illustration for Crown Minerals Act 1991

When you are at a hearing, the person in charge, called the arbitrator, decides how it will work. The arbitrator tries to be fair and make a decision based on what is right, rather than following strict rules. They will look at the main points of the case and try to make a decision that is fair to everyone.

If you or someone else involved in the hearing does not show up, the arbitrator can still go ahead with the hearing. The arbitrator will make decisions based on equity, good conscience, and the substantial merits of the case. They will try to do what is fair and right, even if someone is not there to take part.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM246734.


Previous

68: Conciliation, or

"Help from an arbitrator to resolve land access disagreements"


Next

70: Determination of access arrangement, etc, or

"Deciding how to access someone's land and how much to pay them"

Part 1BPermits, access to land, and other matters
Permits, access to land, and title notations: Access to land other than for minimum impact activity

69Procedure

  1. Except as otherwise provided by this Act, the procedure at a hearing shall be as determined by the arbitrator.

  2. An arbitrator shall act according to equity, good conscience, and the substantial merits of the case without regard for technicalities or legal forms.

  3. An arbitrator may conduct a hearing even though 1 or more of the parties to the hearing fails to attend the hearing.