Part 3Standards, enforcement, and other matters
National Engineering Design Standards (NEDS) for water services networks: Warnings
97RProcess for proposed warning
Before issuing a warning under section 97Q, the chief executive must consider whether—
- any reasonably practicable modifications to the specified water services infrastructure can be made; and
- any reasonably practicable alternative to the specified method may be adopted.
If, after considering those matters, the chief executive proposes to issue a warning, they must consult in accordance with this section.
The chief executive must make a notice containing the following publicly available:
- a statement of the proposed warning:
- reasons for the proposed warning:
- a summary of the assessment of reasonably practicable options:
- the date on which the proposed warning will come into force:
- an invitation for the submission of comments on the proposed warning by a specified date.
The chief executive must consider all comments submitted by the specified date.
The chief executive need not consult if satisfied that the warning needs to be issued urgently for safety reasons.
The chief executive must—
- decide whether to issue the proposed warning (or a variation of the proposed warning); and
- issue any warning in accordance with section 97S.
If the chief executive decides not to issue a warning, they must make that decision publicly available.
The chief executive must follow the process set out in this section for any proposal to amend or revoke a warning.
Notes
- Section 97R: inserted, on , by section 146 of the Local Government (Water Services) (Repeals and Amendments) Act 2025 (2025 No 43).


