This page is about a bill. That means that it's not the law yet, but some people want it to be the law. It could change quickly, and some of the information is just a draft.

Emergency Management Bill (No 2)

Emergency management system role-holders - Regional role-holders - Emergency Management Co-ordinating Executive Groups

39: Appointment of Emergency Management Co-ordinating Executive Group

You could also call this:

"Creating a Team to Help Manage Emergencies"

Illustration for Emergency Management Bill (No 2)

If a bill to change the law is passed, an Emergency Management Committee will have to appoint a group called the Emergency Management Co-ordinating Executive Group. You will have people in this group from different areas, such as the police, Fire and Emergency New Zealand, and ambulance services. The group will also include people with local Māori perspectives and knowledge of rural communities. The Committee will choose who is in the group, and they must include certain people, like the chief executive of each member of the Committee. They will also consider including people with knowledge of specific communities that could help the group do its job, as outlined in section 40. This is so the group can work well together to manage emergencies. The Committee can also add other people to the group if they think it's necessary. You can think of this group like a team that works together to help keep people safe during emergencies. The team will have a mix of people with different skills and knowledge to help them make good decisions.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=LMS1022465.

This page was last updated on View changes


Previous

38: Functions and costs of administering authorities and chief executives of administering authorities, or

"Who does what and how much it costs in emergency groups"


Next

40: Role of Emergency Management Co-ordinating Executive Group, or

"What the Emergency Management Co-ordinating Executive Group does"

Part 2Emergency management system role-holders
Regional role-holders: Emergency Management Co-ordinating Executive Groups

39Appointment of Emergency Management Co-ordinating Executive Group

  1. An Emergency Management Committee must appoint and maintain an Emergency Management Co-ordinating Executive Group.

  2. The membership of each Committee’s Co-ordinating Executive Group consists of—

  3. the chief executive of each member of the Emergency Management Committee or a person acting on the chief executive's behalf; and
    1. a senior Police employee who is assigned for the purpose by the Commissioner of Police; and
      1. a senior employee, volunteer, or contractor of Fire and Emergency New Zealand who is assigned for the purpose by the board of Fire and Emergency New Zealand; and
        1. the chief executive or a senior officer of an ambulance service operating in the area; and
          1. the chief executive or a senior member of a provider of health and disability services operating in the area; and
            1. 1 or more persons with local perspectives of Māori, Māori communities, and their interests and values, including mātauranga Māori (Māori traditional knowledge) and tikanga Māori (Māori protocol and culture), iwi, and hapū in the area; and
              1. 1 or more persons with knowledge, experience, or expertise regarding the interests and needs of rural communities in the area; and
                1. any other persons co-opted by the Emergency Management Committee.
                  1. In addition, an Emergency Management Committee must consider co-opting to the Co-ordinating Executive Group 1 or more persons who, in the opinion of the Committee, have knowledge of the interests of communities related to emergency management in the area that will assist the Co-ordinating Executive Group to fulfil its role under section 40.

                  Compare
                  • 2002 No 33 s 20