This page is about a bill. That means that it's not the law yet, but some people want it to be the law. It could change quickly, and some of the information is just a draft.

Emergency Management Bill (No 2)

Emergency management system planning - Local and sector plans - Regional emergency management plans

94: Community engagement in developing proposal for regional emergency management plan

You could also call this:

"People help make emergency plans for their region"

Illustration for Emergency Management Bill (No 2)

When a proposal for a regional emergency management plan is being developed, you need to know that the Emergency Management Committee has some responsibilities. The Committee must talk to people from communities that might be badly affected in an emergency. They also have to work with and involve iwi and Māori representatives in their area. This is part of making a proposal for a regional emergency management plan.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=LMS1022501.

This page was last updated on View changes


Previous

93: Reviews of regional emergency management plans, or

"Checking and Updating Regional Emergency Plans"


Next

95: Public notification for proposal for regional emergency management plan, or

"Telling the public about a new emergency plan and letting them have a say"

Part 3Emergency management system planning
Local and sector plans: Regional emergency management plans

94Community engagement in developing proposal for regional emergency management plan

  1. In developing a proposal, the Emergency Management Committee must—

  2. engage with representatives of any community that the Committee considers is likely to be a disproportionately affected community in an emergency in the Committee’s area; and
    1. engage with and involve representatives of iwi and Māori in the Committee’s area.
      Compare
      • 2002 No 33 ss 49(1), 52