Plain language law

New Zealand law explained for everyone

Plain Language Law homepage
201: Persons who may appeal to Tribunal on facts
or “Who can appeal deportation decisions based on facts”

You could also call this:

“Reasons the Tribunal may allow your deportation appeal”

When you appeal against being deported, the Tribunal must allow your appeal if certain conditions are met. These conditions depend on why you are being deported.

If you’re being deported because of an administrative error, the Tribunal must let you stay if they believe your visa wasn’t given to you by mistake.

If you’re being deported because your visa was given to you under a false identity, the Tribunal must let you stay if they believe this isn’t true.

If you’re being deported because you provided false information in your visa application, the Tribunal must let you stay if they believe all the information you gave was true and you didn’t hide anything important.

If you’re being deported because you broke the conditions of your visa, the Tribunal must let you stay if they believe you followed all the conditions or any breach wasn’t serious.

If you’re being deported because of new information about your character, the Tribunal must let you stay if they believe this information wasn’t important when you got your visa, or you would have still been eligible for the visa even with this information.

If you’re being deported because there are questions about your refugee or protected person status, the Tribunal must let you stay if they don’t believe your status was obtained through fraud or that important information wasn’t considered when your status was granted.

The Tribunal makes these decisions based on whether they think it’s more likely than not that these conditions are met.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.


Next up: 203: Process when entitlement to appeal on facts and humanitarian grounds

or “How to appeal deportation on factual and humanitarian grounds”

Part 7 Appeals, reviews, and other proceedings
Appeal on facts against liability for deportation

202Grounds for determining appeal on facts

  1. The Tribunal must allow an appeal against liability for deportation on the facts where,—

  2. in the case of an appellant liable for deportation under section 155, the Tribunal is satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that the resident visa or permanent resident visa was not granted as a result of an administrative error:
    1. in the case of an appellant liable for deportation under section 156(1)(b), the Tribunal is satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that the resident visa or permanent resident visa was not granted to the person in a false identity:
      1. in the case of an appellant liable for deportation under section 158(1)(b)(i), the Tribunal is satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that none of the information provided in relation to the person's application, or purported application, for a residence class visa or entry permission was fraudulent, forged, false, or misleading, and no relevant information was concealed:
        1. in the case of an appellant liable for deportation under section 158(1)(b)(ii), the Tribunal is satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that none of the information provided in relation to the person's, or any other person’s, application, or purported application, for a visa on the basis of which the residence class visa was granted was fraudulent, forged, false, or misleading, and no relevant information was concealed:
          1. in the case of an appellant liable for deportation under section 159, the Tribunal is satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that—
            1. the conditions of the resident visa were met; or
              1. the resident has not materially breached the conditions of his or her visa:
              2. in the case of an appellant liable for deportation under section 160, the Tribunal is satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that—
                1. the new information was not material to the applicant’s character as at the time the visa was granted; or
                  1. the person would have been eligible for the grant of the visa under this Act or immigration instructions:
                  2. in the case of an appellant liable for deportation under section 162, the Tribunal is not satisfied that—
                    1. the person's recognition as a refugee or a protected person may have been procured by fraud, forgery, false or misleading representation, or concealment of relevant information; or
                      1. the matters dealt with in Articles 1D, 1E, and 1F of the Refugee Convention may not have been able to be properly considered by a refugee and protection officer (or a refugee status officer under the former Act) for any reason, including by reason of fraud, forgery, false or misleading representation, or concealment of relevant information.
                      Notes
                      • Section 202(c): replaced, on , by section 57 of the Immigration Amendment Act 2015 (2015 No 48).
                      • Section 202(ca): inserted, on , by section 57 of the Immigration Amendment Act 2015 (2015 No 48).