Corrections Act 2004

Corrections system - Miscellaneous - Property damage caused by escapers

186: Rules governing compensation

You could also call this:

"Getting paid back for damage caused by someone who escaped from prison"

Illustration for Corrections Act 2004

If you want to get compensation for property damage caused by someone who escaped, the court must be satisfied that something was done or not done that caused the damage. The court must also be satisfied that the damage resulted from that action. You can get up to $50,000 in compensation, but no more than that. When the court decides how much compensation to give you, it looks at whether you did anything to cause the damage or if you failed to stop it from happening.

The court also subtracts any money you got from other sources, like insurance or from the person who escaped. You must apply for compensation within one year of the damage happening, but the court can give you more time if it thinks it's fair. If you do get compensation, you can't then sue the person who escaped for the same damage, because the right to sue is transferred to someone else, like the prison manager or the government.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM296598.


Previous

185: Compensation for property damage by escapers, or

"Money for damage caused by someone escaping from prison"


Next

187: Notification and payment of compensation, or

"Getting paid if someone escapes and you're affected"

Part 2Corrections system
Miscellaneous: Property damage caused by escapers

186Rules governing compensation

  1. No compensation may be awarded under section 185 unless the court is satisfied, on a balance of probabilities,—

  2. that there was an act or omission of the kind referred to in section 185; and
    1. that the loss or damage resulted from that act or omission.
      1. Despite any other enactment, the amount awarded to any applicant under section 185 may, in the aggregate, amount to $50,000, but must not exceed that amount.

      2. In determining the amount (if any) to be awarded to any applicant under section 185, the court—

      3. must have regard to any behaviour of the applicant that directly or indirectly contributed to the loss or damage, and to any failure by the applicant to take reasonable steps to avoid or mitigate the loss or damage; and
        1. must deduct any payments received by the applicant by way of compensation or damages from the escaper or any person on the escaper's behalf, or under the Injury Prevention, Rehabilitation, and Compensation Act 2001, in respect of the loss or damage; and
          1. must deduct any payments received by, or payable to, the applicant under any policy of insurance in respect of the property; and
            1. may have regard to any other circumstances that it considers relevant.
              1. For the purposes of subsection (3)(a), a failure by the applicant to insure against the loss or damage must, if the court considers that the failure was imprudent, having regard to the circumstances of the case and to normal practice, be treated as a failure to take reasonable steps to avoid the loss or damage.

              2. No compensation may be awarded under this section unless the application is made within 1 year from the time the loss or damage occurs, but the court may, at any time before or after the expiry of that period, extend the time for making an application for any further period if, in the circumstances of the case, the court considers it appropriate to do so.

              3. If any compensation is awarded under section 185, any right of action the applicant may have against the escaper is subrogated,—

              4. subject to paragraph (b), if, at the time the escaper escaped, the escaper was a prisoner of a contract prison, to the contractor responsible for managing that prison:
                1. despite paragraph (a), if, at the time the escaper escaped, the escaper was under the control of a security officer, to the security contractor by whom that security officer was employed at the time:
                  1. in any other case, to the Crown.
                    Compare
                    • 1954 No 51 s 41A(3)–(7), (9)