Corrections Act 2004

Corrections system - Offences - Offences against discipline

134: Decision as to who is to hear charge

You could also call this:

"Who gets to decide your punishment when you break the rules in prison?"

Illustration for Corrections Act 2004

When you are in trouble for something you did wrong in prison, someone will hear your case. This person is called a hearing adjudicator. They can send your case to a Visiting Justice if they think it's a serious offence.

You might be sent to a Visiting Justice if the adjudicator thinks you could get a bigger penalty than they can give. They might also send you if your case is complicated and has tricky legal issues. The adjudicator can send you to a Visiting Justice if both of these things are true.

If the adjudicator sends your case to a Visiting Justice, they must write down why they made this decision and send it to the Visiting Justice, who will then hear your case in accordance with section 137 and consider penalties as outlined in section 133.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM296509.


Previous

133A: Hearing adjudicator may proceed with hearing without prisoner present, or

"The adjudicator can hold a hearing without the prisoner if they don't attend or behave badly."


Next

135: Applications for legal representation, or

"Asking for a lawyer when you're in prison and facing a discipline hearing"

Part 2Corrections system
Offences: Offences against discipline

134Decision as to who is to hear charge

  1. If a complaint alleging an offence against discipline is brought before a hearing adjudicator, the adjudicator may, at any time before making a decision as to whether the charge is proved, refer the case to a Visiting Justice for hearing and determination in accordance with section 137.

  2. A hearing adjudicator may exercise the powers conferred by subsection (1) only if the adjudicator considers—

  3. that the conduct that is alleged to constitute the offence may warrant a higher penalty than can be imposed by the adjudicator under section 133; or
    1. that, because of the complexity of the issues likely to arise (including, without limitation, points of law), it would be appropriate for the case to be referred to a Visiting Justice; or
      1. that both paragraphs (a) and (b) apply.
        1. If a hearing adjudicator exercises the powers conferred by subsection (1), the adjudicator must forward a summary of his or her reasons for the decision to the Visiting Justice.

        Compare
        • 1954 No 51 s 34(4)(a)