Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006

Complaints and discipline - New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal

235: Quorum

You could also call this:

"How many people need to be at a Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal meeting to make decisions"

Illustration for Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006

When the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal meets, you need 5 members to be there. A quorum is not present if no lay member is there or if there are more lay members than other members. The chairperson and other members make decisions by voting. If the votes are tied, the chairperson's vote wins. There are some exceptions to the 5-member rule, such as when the Tribunal is making interim name suppression orders or suspending a practitioner. In these cases, a quorum is the chairperson, a lay member, and one other specific member. You can find more information about these exceptions in section 240(4) and section 245. The 3-member quorum must include the chairperson, a lay member, and a member appointed under section 228(d) or section 228(e). This rule is also subject to section 244(2).

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM366788.

This page was last updated on View changes


Previous

234: Constitution for proceedings, or

"Who makes decisions at the Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal"


Next

236: Rules of natural justice, or

"Being Fair: Following Basic Rules of Justice"

Part 7Complaints and discipline
New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal

235Quorum

  1. The quorum at any sitting of the Disciplinary Tribunal or a division of the Disciplinary Tribunal is 5 members of the Disciplinary Tribunal.

  2. Despite subsection (1), a quorum is not present if—

  3. no lay member is present; or
    1. the number of lay members present exceeds the number of members present who hold office under section 228(d) or section 228(e).
      1. Every question before the Disciplinary Tribunal or a division of the Disciplinary Tribunal is to be determined by the opinion of the majority of the members present at a sitting of the Disciplinary Tribunal or division, and, if the members are equally divided in their opinions, that of the chairperson prevails.

      2. Subsection (1) is subject to subsection (5) (which permits a reduced, specified 3-member quorum for specified purposes) and section 244(2) (which specifies minimum attendance and voting requirements for the making of certain orders).

      3. For the purposes specified in section 240(4) (which relates to interim name suppression orders), and for the purposes of section 245 (which relates to interim suspension from practice), the quorum at any sitting of the Disciplinary Tribunal or a division of the Disciplinary Tribunal is (not only compliance with subsection (2)(b) of this section, but also) the following 3 members of the Disciplinary Tribunal:

      4. the chairperson of the Disciplinary Tribunal; and
        1. a lay member of the Disciplinary Tribunal; and
          1. either—
            1. a member of the Disciplinary Tribunal appointed under section 228(d) (if the practitioner to whom the charge relates is a lawyer); or
              1. a member of the Disciplinary Tribunal appointed under section 228(e) (if the practitioner to whom the charge relates is a conveyancing practitioner).
              Notes
              • Section 235(4): replaced, on , by section 15 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Amendment Act 2012 (2012 No 92).
              • Section 235(5): inserted, on , by section 15 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Amendment Act 2012 (2012 No 92).