Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006

Miscellaneous provisions - Transitional provisions in respect of complaints and disciplinary proceedings

357: Exercise by Lawyers Standards Committee of role of District Disciplinary Tribunal

You could also call this:

"Lawyers Standards Committee acts like a court for unfinished cases"

Illustration for Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006

You need to know what happens to some court cases. If a case is not finished within 6 months, the New Zealand Law Society must appoint a Lawyers Standards Committee. This committee does the job of a District Disciplinary Tribunal. It acts like a District Disciplinary Tribunal would have under the Law Practitioners Act 1982. The Law Practitioners Act 1982 is an old law that is no longer used, but some of its rules still apply in this situation, such as section 106(4), which mentions the District Law Society, but now refers to the New Zealand Law Society.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM367860.

This page was last updated on View changes


Previous

356: Exercise by Lawyers Standards Committee of role of complaints committee, or

"Lawyers Standards Committee handles unfinished complaints"


Next

358: Exercise by New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal of role of New Zealand Law Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal, or

"Tribunal takes over unfinished cases after 6 months"

Part 11Miscellaneous provisions
Transitional provisions in respect of complaints and disciplinary proceedings

357Exercise by Lawyers Standards Committee of role of District Disciplinary Tribunal

  1. If any proceedings to which section 353 applies have not been determined by the close of the period of 6 months beginning with the date of the commencement of this section, the New Zealand Law Society must, despite the repeals effected by this Act, appoint a Lawyers Standards Committee (not being a Lawyers Standards Committee that has, under section 356, the powers of a complaints committee in relation to those proceedings) to carry out the duties and exercise the powers that a District Disciplinary Tribunal within the meaning of the Law Practitioners Act 1982 would have had, under that Act, in relation to those proceedings if that Act had not been repealed.

  2. Section 106(4) of the Law Practitioners Act 1982 has effect, for the purposes of subsection (1) of this section, as if, for the words District Law Society in both places where they appear, there were substituted in each case the words New Zealand Law Society.