Biosecurity Act 1993

Pest management - Regional pathway management plans

100: Management agencies

You could also call this:

"Who helps manage plans to keep New Zealand's environment safe and healthy?"

When a regional pathway management plan is made, a management agency must be chosen. This agency can be a department, a council, a territorial authority, or a body corporate. You need to think about which body is best to manage the plan.

The Minister or council must consider a few things when deciding which body to choose. They must think about who is paying for the plan and whether they are happy with the chosen body. They must also think about whether the people affected by the plan are happy with the chosen body. The Minister or council must consider whether the body has the skills and resources to manage the plan.

If the management agency resigns, goes into liquidation, or ceases to exist, the Minister or council must appoint a new agency as soon as possible. They must also tell the public about the new appointment. You can find more information about changes to this law in the Biosecurity Law Reform Act 2012.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM316044.


Previous

99: Definitions for sections 100 to 100G, or

"What special words mean in sections 100 to 100G of the Biosecurity Act 1993"


Next

100A: Powers in Part 6, or

"What powers can be used to manage regional pathways?"

Part 5Pest management
Regional pathway management plans

100Management agencies

  1. The management agency specified in a plan must be 1 of the following bodies:

  2. a department:
    1. a council:
      1. a territorial authority:
        1. a body corporate.
          1. In deciding which body is to be the management agency, the Minister or council must take the following into consideration:

          2. the need for accountability to those providing the funds to implement the plan; and
            1. the acceptability of the body to—
              1. those providing the funds to implement the plan; and
                1. those subject to management provisions under the plan; and
                2. the capacity of the body to manage the plan, including the competence and expertise of the body's employees and contractors.
                  1. Subsection (4) applies if a management agency—

                  2. gives the Minister or council a written notice of resignation; or
                    1. goes into liquidation, receivership, statutory management, or voluntary administration; or
                      1. ceases to exist.
                        1. The Minister or council must, as soon as practicable,—

                        2. appoint another body to be the management agency; and
                          1. publicly notify the appointment.
                            Notes
                            • Section 100: replaced, on , by section 39 of the Biosecurity Law Reform Act 2012 (2012 No 73).