Search and Surveillance Act 2012

Enforcement officers' powers and orders - Surveillance device warrants and declaratory orders - Surveillance device warrant reports

62: Actions on receipt of report on use of surveillance device in situation of urgency or emergency

You could also call this:

"What happens when a Judge gets a report about using a surveillance device in an emergency?"

Illustration for Search and Surveillance Act 2012

When a Judge gets a report about using a surveillance device in an urgent or emergency situation, they can do several things. They can give directions about what to do with the information collected from the surveillance device. If they think the surveillance device was not used correctly under section 48, they can report this to the person in charge of the agency. They can also order that the person being surveilled is told about it. The Judge will only make this order if they think it is more important for the public to know than it is to keep the information secret to protect an investigation, informants, or international relationships.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM2136718.


Previous

61: Actions on receipt of surveillance device warrant report, or

"What happens when a Judge gets a report about a surveillance device warrant?"


Next

63: Retention of raw surveillance data, excerpts, and information obtained, or

"How long police can keep information they collect when watching people"

Part 3Enforcement officers' powers and orders
Surveillance device warrants and declaratory orders: Surveillance device warrant reports

62Actions on receipt of report on use of surveillance device in situation of urgency or emergency

  1. A Judge receiving a report under section 60 may do any 1 or more of the following:

  2. give directions as to the destruction or retention of the material obtained as a result of the use of the surveillance device:
    1. if he or she considers that the use of the surveillance device was not authorised under section 48, report accordingly to the chief executive of the relevant agency:
      1. order that the subject of the surveillance be notified.
        1. The Judge must not make an order under subsection (1)(c) unless he or she is satisfied that—

        2. the circumstances set out in subsection (3) exist; and
          1. use of the surveillance device was a serious breach of the criteria set out in section 48.
            1. The circumstances are that the public interest in notification outweighs any potential prejudice to any 1 or more of the following:

            2. any investigation by the law enforcement agency:
              1. the safety of informants or undercover officers:
                1. the supply of information to the law enforcement agency:
                  1. any international relationships of the law enforcement agency.