Search and Surveillance Act 2012

General provisions in relation to search, surveillance, and inspection powers - Privilege and confidentiality - Examination orders and production orders

138: Privilege against self-incrimination

You could also call this:

"You have the right to stay quiet if answering a question might get you in trouble."

If you get an examination order or a production order, you still have the right not to say something that might get you in trouble, as stated in section 60 of the Evidence Act 2006. You can only use this right if it is based on section 60 of the Evidence Act 2006. If you refuse to answer a question or give information because you think it might get you in trouble, the person asking you can go to a District Court Judge to decide if you really do have the right not to answer.

If this happens, you will have to give the Judge enough information to help them decide if you would really get in trouble if you answered the question. The Judge will look at whether it is reasonably likely that you would get in trouble if you answered.

You should know that section 63 of the Evidence Act 2006 does not apply to examination orders or production orders.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM2136847.


Previous

137: Lawyers' trust accounts, or

"Rules for lawyers to keep clients' money safe and what happens if police want to see the records"


Next

139: Other privileges, or

"Claiming the right to stay quiet or keep information secret"

Part 4General provisions in relation to search, surveillance, and inspection powers
Privilege and confidentiality: Examination orders and production orders

138Privilege against self-incrimination

  1. An examination order or a production order does not affect the privilege against self-incrimination that an individual may have under section 60 of the Evidence Act 2006.

  2. Any assertion of a privilege against self-incrimination must be based on section 60 of the Evidence Act 2006.

  3. If any individual refuses to produce any information or document or to answer any question on the ground that it is a privileged communication under section 60 of the Evidence Act 2006, the Commissioner or other enforcement officer concerned may apply to a District Court Judge for an order determining whether or not the claim of privilege is valid.

  4. For the purposes of determining any application referred to in subsection (3), the individual must offer sufficient evidence to enable the District Court Judge to assess whether self-incrimination is reasonably likely if the individual produced the information or the document or answered the question.

  5. Section 63 of the Evidence Act 2006 does not apply to an examination order or to a production order.