Oranga Tamariki Act 1989

Youth justice - Prosecution of children and young persons

248: Family group conference not required in certain cases

You could also call this:

"When a young person commits a crime, they might not need a family group conference in some situations."

Illustration for Oranga Tamariki Act 1989

You do not always need a family group conference when a young person commits a crime. This can happen if the young person has already been to court for another crime, or if they are already in jail or on a community-based sentence, as defined in the Sentencing Act 2002. A youth justice co-ordinator can decide not to have a family group conference if they think it would not be useful.

If a family group conference has already been held for a young person, you might not need another one if they commit another crime soon after. The youth justice co-ordinator will talk to the young person's family and the people who would attend the conference to decide what to do. They will think about how the young person responded to the last conference and how serious the new crime is.

Before making a decision, the youth justice co-ordinator must consider whether a family group conference is necessary to decide if the young person should pay back the people they hurt. Youth justice co-ordinators have to follow rules when making these decisions, and they have to talk to the right people. They will consider the young person's whole situation before deciding what to do.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM152972.


Previous

247A: Family group conference not required, suspended, or discontinued when charges include Schedule 1A offence and non-Schedule 1A offence, or

"No family group conference if you're charged with serious and less serious crimes at the same time."


Next

248A: Chief executive to appoint youth advocate to represent child or young person if offence punishable by imprisonment of 10 years or more, or

"A youth advocate will be appointed to help you if you're in trouble with the law for something serious."

Part 4Youth justice
Prosecution of children and young persons

248Family group conference not required in certain cases

  1. Nothing in section 245(1)(c) or section 246(b) or section 247(b) or (d) or (e) or section 281 requires a family group conference to be held in respect of any offence alleged or proved to have been committed by a young person if—

  2. the offence is alleged or proved to have been committed on a date that is earlier than the date on which—for any other offence (not being an offence the maximum penalty for which is less than the maximum penalty that may be imposed in respect of the first-mentioned offence); or
    1. the young person was convicted and sentenced in the High Court or the District Court; or
      1. the Youth Court made an order under section 283 in respect of that young person—
      2. the young person is subject to a sentence of imprisonment or a community-based sentence (as those terms are defined in section 4(1) of the Sentencing Act 2002), or to a sentence of home detention imposed under section 80A of the Sentencing Act 2002, or to any order made under any of paragraphs (k) to (o) of section 283,—
        1. and, subject to subsection (5), in either case, a youth justice co-ordinator is of the view that the holding of a family group conference would serve no useful purpose, and the family or whanau or family group of the young person agree with that view.

        2. Where—

        3. a family group conference has been convened pursuant to section 247 in relation to any offence alleged or proved to have been committed by a child or young person; and
          1. before the family group conference has made any decision, recommendation, or plan pursuant to section 260 in relation to that offence, that child or young person is alleged or proven to have committed any other offence (being an offence in respect of which a family group conference would be required to be held pursuant to section 247),—
            1. the family group conference may make in respect of the latter offence any decision, recommendation, or plan that it is empowered to make under section 260, and it shall not be necessary to convene a separate family group conference in relation to that latter offence.

            2. Nothing in section 245(1)(c) or section 246(b) or section 247(b) or (d) or (e)or section 281 requires a family group conference to be held in respect of any offence alleged or proved to have been committed by a young person if—

            3. the requirement to convene a conference under any of those sections arose within 6 weeks of the completion of a previous family group conference—
              1. that was convened under this Part in respect of any other offence; and
                1. that had the opportunity to consider how that offence should be dealt with; and
                2. subject to subsections (4) and (5), a youth justice co-ordinator—
                  1. is of the view that the holding of a family group conference would serve no useful purpose; and
                    1. is satisfied that—agree with that view.
                      1. the family, whanau, or family group of the young person; and
                        1. each of the persons who would be entitled to attend a family group conference under any of paragraphs (d) to (n) of section 251
                      2. Before forming a view as to whether or not a family group conference would serve a useful purpose under subsection (3), the youth justice co-ordinator shall—

                      3. consult with—
                        1. the family, whanau, or family group of the young person concerned; and
                          1. the persons who would be entitled to attend the family group conference pursuant to any of paragraphs (d) to (n) of section 251; and
                          2. have regard to—
                            1. the response of the young person to any decisions, recommendations, or plans made or formulated by the previous family group conference; and
                              1. the seriousness and extent of the offending alleged or proved to have been committed by the young person and that gives rise to the requirement to hold a family group conference.
                              2. Before forming a view as to whether or not a family group conference would serve a useful purpose under subsection (1) or subsection (3), the youth justice co-ordinator shall consider whether a family group conference is necessary for the purpose of considering whether the young person should be required to make reparation for any offence.

                              Notes
                              • Section 248: replaced, on , by section 34 of the Children, Young Persons, and Their Families Amendment Act 1994 (1994 No 121).
                              • Section 248(1)(a)(i): amended, on , by section 261 of the District Court Act 2016 (2016 No 49).
                              • Section 248(1)(a)(ii): amended, on , by section 261 of the District Court Act 2016 (2016 No 49).
                              • Section 248(1)(b): amended, on , by section 58 of the Sentencing Amendment Act 2007 (2007 No 27).
                              • Section 248(1)(b): amended, on , by section 186 of the Sentencing Act 2002 (2002 No 9).