Social Security Act 2018

Administration - Payment of benefits, tax on benefits, debts and deductions - Debts and deductions

361: Recovery from spouse or partner of unapportioned excess amount beneficiary obtained by fraud

You could also call this:

"Getting back benefit money from a spouse or partner who got it because of someone else's cheating"

Illustration for Social Security Act 2018

If you get a benefit payment that you are not supposed to get, and you got it by cheating, the government might want that money back. You might have a spouse or partner who also got some of that money, even if they did not know you cheated. If the government thinks your spouse or partner knew they were getting money they should not have, or should have known, they might have to pay that money back too. The government can take back the extra money from your spouse or partner, as they are also responsible for paying it back. This does not stop the government from also taking back the extra money from you, or from taking other action against you for cheating, under section 362 or other laws.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM6783862.


Previous

360: Obtaining amount by fraud: meaning and proof, or

"What fraud means and how it's proven when getting money wrongly"


Next

362: MSD’s duty to recover debts, or

"MSD must try to get back money people owe to the government, except in special cases"

Part 6Administration
Payment of benefits, tax on benefits, debts and deductions: Debts and deductions

361Recovery from spouse or partner of unapportioned excess amount beneficiary obtained by fraud

  1. This section applies to a beneficiary’s (B’s) spouse or partner (S) if—

  2. B has obtained or received an amount (payment, credit, or advance)—
    1. in excess of the amount to which B was entitled; or
      1. to which B has no entitlement; and
      2. B, in MSD’s opinion, obtained that amount (payment, credit, or advance) in excess by fraud; and
        1. none of the amount in excess has been apportioned to S; and
          1. S, in MSD’s opinion, either—
            1. knowingly benefited directly or indirectly from B’s fraud; or
              1. ought to have known (even if B did not know) that S was benefiting directly or indirectly from B’s fraud.
              2. The amount in excess that S obtained by B’s fraud is a debt due to the Crown, and subject to recovery under section 362, from S.

              3. The excess amount may be recovered under this section from S on the basis that S is jointly and severally liable.

              4. This section therefore does not limit or affect—

              5. recovery under section 362 from B of the excess amount recoverable under this section and section 362 from S:
                1. any other civil or criminal liability of B, under any other laws, in respect of that excess amount.
                  Compare