Maritime Transport Act 1994

Regulation of alcohol consumption by seafarers

40O: Certificates in proceedings

You could also call this:

"Using special papers as proof in court for drinking alcohol on ships"

Illustration for Maritime Transport Act 1994

If you are in court for breaking a rule about drinking alcohol on a ship, a special paper called a certificate can be used as evidence. This certificate is enough proof of what it says, unless someone can prove it is wrong. The certificate must be signed by a doctor or someone who is allowed to take blood samples.

When a doctor takes a blood sample from you, they must follow certain steps and write them down in the certificate. They must say how they took the sample and what they did with it. The doctor must also say that they gave you the sample container in a special sealed kit.

If you are in hospital and a doctor takes a blood sample from you, they can use this as evidence too. The doctor must write down why they took the sample and what they did with it. They must also say that they told you why they were taking the sample, or that they told you later if you were unconscious.

A special person called an approved analyst can also write a certificate if they get a blood sample to test. They must say what they found in the sample and that it was not damaged in any way. This certificate can be used in court as evidence against you.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM5689978.


Previous

40N: Procedure for dealing with blood specimens, or

"What happens to your blood sample after it's taken by the police or a doctor"


Next

40P: Certificates of compliance for evidential breath-testing devices, or

"Proof that breath-testing devices on ships are working correctly"

Part 4ARegulation of alcohol consumption by seafarers

40OCertificates in proceedings

  1. Except as provided in section 40S, production of a certificate to which this section applies in proceedings for an offence against this Part is sufficient evidence, in the absence of proof to the contrary, of the matters that are stated in the certificate and of the sufficiency of the authority and qualifications of the person by whom the certificate is made and, in the case of a certificate referred to in subsection (5), of the person who carried out the analysis.

  2. This section applies to a certificate purporting to be signed by a medical practitioner or medical officer and certifying that—

  3. a specimen of venous blood was taken by the medical practitioner or medical officer in accordance with the blood specimen collecting procedure specified in the certificate from a person named in the certificate; and
    1. for the purposes of the specified blood specimen collecting procedure,—
      1. the specimen was sufficient; or
        1. the specimen was insufficient and the medical practitioner or medical officer took a further specimen; and
        2. in accordance with the specified blood specimen collecting procedure, the medical practitioner or medical officer kept the specimen in the appropriate container or containers (as applicable); and
          1. each container was received by the medical practitioner or medical officer in a sealed blood specimen collecting kit; and
            1. the medical practitioner or medical officer handed each container to an enforcement officer named in the certificate.
              1. This section also applies to a certificate purporting to be signed by a medical practitioner and certifying that—

              2. the person named in the certificate was in a hospital or medical centre; and
                1. the medical practitioner, being a medical practitioner in immediate charge of the examination, care, or treatment of that person, took a blood specimen or caused a blood specimen to be taken by any other medical practitioner or any medical officer from the person under section 40M; and
                  1. the medical practitioner has reasonable grounds to suspect that the person—
                    1. is a seafarer; and
                      1. was in the hospital or medical centre as a result of—
                        1. an accident or incident involving a ship:
                          1. an injury or a medical condition arising subsequent to an accident or incident involving the use of a ship; and
                        2. before taking the blood specimen or causing the blood specimen to be taken from the person, the medical practitioner examined the person and was satisfied that the taking of the blood specimen would not be prejudicial to the person's proper care or treatment; and
                          1. the medical practitioner—
                            1. told the person that the blood specimen was being or had been taken under section 40M for evidential purposes; or
                              1. if the person was unconscious when the specimen was taken, notified the person in writing as soon as practicable that the blood specimen was taken under section 40M for evidential purposes.
                              2. This section also applies to a certificate purporting to be signed by a medical practitioner or medical officer and certifying—

                              3. all the matters referred to in subsection (2)(a) to (d); and
                                1. that the medical practitioner or medical officer sent or caused to be sent by registered post, personal delivery, or delivery by courier, on a specified date, the specimen to a specified approved laboratory in accordance with section 40N; and
                                  1. that, if at the time the blood specimen was taken more than 1 approved laboratory existed, the medical practitioner or medical officer had notified the Commissioner in writing of the approved laboratory to which the specimen was delivered or posted.
                                    1. This section also applies to a certificate purporting to be signed by an approved analyst and certifying that—

                                    2. a blood specimen in a sealed container was, on a specified date, delivered to an approved analyst (or a person employed by an approved laboratory and approved for the purpose by an approved analyst) for analysis, and was delivered by registered post or personal delivery or delivery by courier; and
                                      1. on analysis of the blood specimen by an analyst specified in the certificate, the presence or a specified proportion of alcohol was found in the specimen; and
                                        1. no such deterioration or congealing of the specimen was found as would prevent a proper analysis.
                                          1. This section also applies to a certificate purporting to be signed by an approved analyst and certifying that, following an application under section 40N, a blood specimen was posted to a specified private analyst by registered post, personal delivery, or delivery by courier, and addressed to the private analyst at the address given in the application.

                                          2. For the purposes of this section, it is not necessary for the person making a certificate to specify his or her entitlement to give the certificate if the certificate indicates that the person belongs to the general category of persons who may make the certificate.

                                          Compare
                                          Notes
                                          • Section 40O: inserted, on , by section 12 of the Maritime Transport Amendment Act 2013 (2013 No 84).
                                          • Section 40O(3)(a): amended, on , by section 76 of the Statutes Amendment Act 2022 (2022 No 75).
                                          • Section 40O(3)(c)(ii): amended, on , by section 76 of the Statutes Amendment Act 2022 (2022 No 75).