Civil Aviation Act 2023

Monitoring, investigation, and enforcement - Evidence and proof

384: Evidence and proof of rule in any proceedings

You could also call this:

"Proving rules are real and made correctly in court"

Illustration for Civil Aviation Act 2023

When you are in a court case, you need to prove things are true. If someone shows a copy of a rule in court, it is enough proof that the rule exists. It is also proof that the rule was made correctly, following the rules in Part 3.

The copy can be of a rule made by the Minister under subpart 1 of Part 3, or an emergency rule made by the Director under section 67. You can use these copies as proof unless someone can show that they are not correct. This is one way to prove that a rule is real and was made properly.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=LMS159023.


Previous

383: Evidence and proof in offence-related proceedings: other matters, or

"Rules for using evidence in aviation court cases"


Next

385: State of mind of employees and agents attributed, or

"What staff think can be used to figure out what a company or person was thinking."

Part 9Monitoring, investigation, and enforcement
Evidence and proof

384Evidence and proof of rule in any proceedings

  1. Unless the contrary is proved, and without limiting any other method of proof, the production in any proceedings of a copy of an item specified in subsection (2) is sufficient evidence of—

  2. the rule; and
    1. the fact that it has been made in accordance with Part 3.
      1. The items for the purposes of subsection (1) are—

      2. a rule purporting to have been made by the Minister under subpart 1 of Part 3; or
        1. any emergency rule purporting to have been made by the Director under section 67.
          Compare