Civil Aviation Act 2023

Aviation security - Designations and security checks - Security checks of persons

132: Offence to fail to comply with Director’s requirement to withdraw or revoke authorisation

You could also call this:

"Breaking the rules: not following the Director's orders to cancel or stop an authorisation"

If you do not follow the Director's instructions to withdraw or revoke an authorisation, you can commit an offence. The Director might tell you to withdraw an authorisation under section 127(2)(e) or revoke an authorisation under section 130(b). You will only be in trouble if you do not have a good reason for not following the instructions.

If you commit this offence, you can be fined up to $35,000 when you are convicted. This is what happens if you break the rules and do not follow the Director's requirements. You must have a reasonable excuse to avoid getting into trouble.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=LMS49681.


Previous

131: Offence to carry out activity while authorisation withdrawn or after authorisation revoked, or

"Breaking the law: doing something without permission after it's been taken away"


Next

133: Interpretation, or

"What special words mean in the Civil Aviation Act 2023"

Part 5Aviation security
Designations and security checks: Security checks of persons

132Offence to fail to comply with Director’s requirement to withdraw or revoke authorisation

  1. A person commits an offence if the person fails, without reasonable excuse, to comply with the Director’s requirement to—

  2. withdraw an authorisation under section 127(2)(e); or
    1. revoke an authorisation under section 130(b).
      1. A person who commits an offence against subsection (1) is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $35,000.

      Compare