Civil Aviation Act 2023

Monitoring, investigation, and enforcement - Powers of entry of Airways

337: Meaning of equipment for purposes of section 338

You could also call this:

"What 'equipment' means in the law about Airways' old gear"

Illustration for Civil Aviation Act 2023

When you read about equipment in relation to section 338, equipment refers to things used by Airways to do their job. These things must have been installed before 1 January 1988. Equipment also includes cables, wires, navigational aids, and other things like that.

If Airways gives a certificate saying some equipment was installed before 1 January 1988, you can use that certificate as evidence in court. The certificate is proof that the equipment was installed before that date, unless someone can prove otherwise. You can trust the certificate unless there is a good reason not to.

This text is automatically generated. It might be out of date or be missing some parts. Find out more about how we do this.

This page was last updated on

View the original legislation for this page at https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1986/0120/latest/link.aspx?id=LMS50150.


Previous

336: Director has powers of inspector and response officer, or

"The Director has the same powers as inspectors and response officers to enforce aviation laws."


Next

338: Powers of entry of Airways, or

"Airways can enter land to check or fix their equipment, but they must follow rules and give notice."

Part 9Monitoring, investigation, and enforcement
Powers of entry of Airways

337Meaning of equipment for purposes of section 338

  1. In section 338, equipment

  2. means equipment—
    1. used for the purpose of carrying out the functions of Airways; and
      1. installed before 1 January 1988; and
      2. includes cables, wires, navigational aids, or other equipment.
        1. A certificate given by Airways containing a statement that any equipment was installed before 1 January 1988—

        2. is admissible in evidence in any proceedings; and
          1. in the absence of proof to the contrary, constitutes proof of that statement.
            Compare